|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Statement of compliance
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these Group annual financial statements are set out below in the related notes and are consistent with those adopted in the prior year, unless otherwise specified.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the SAICA Financial Reporting Guides as issued by the Accounting Practices Committee and Financial Reporting Pronouncements as issued by Financial Reporting Standards Council, the JSE Listings Requirements and the Companies Act, No 71 of 2008.
The term IFRS includes International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), International Accounting Standards (IAS) and interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) or the former Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC). The standards referred to are set by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
Basis of preparation
The annual financial statements and Group financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention, except for certain financial and equity instruments which have been measured at fair value. Amounts are rounded to the nearest thousand with the exception of earnings per share, ordinary share capital and equity compensation benefit. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.
Judgements made by management in the application of IFRS that have a significant effect on the financial statements and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustment in the next year are discussed in .
Going concern
The Group and Company’s forecasts and projections, taking account of reasonably possible changes in trading performance, show that the Group and Company should be able to operate within its current funding levels.
After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group and Company have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. The Group and Company therefore continue to adopt the going-concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Standards, interpretations and amendments effective in 2014
The following standards and amendments are effective for the first time for the year ended 31 May 2014 and have been applied when presenting the Group’s financial statements:
IFRS 12 – Disclosures of Interests In Other Entities
The adoption of IFRS 12 – Disclosures of Interest In Other Entities resulted in additional disclosures on interest in non-controlling interests () and interests in associates and joint ventures ().
IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements
The adoption of IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements did not result in any change in the consolidation status of its subsidiaries.
IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements
The adoption of IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements did not result in any change in the accounting for joint arrangements.
IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement
The adoption of IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement did not result in any change in the Group’s accounting treatments.
Amendment to IAS 1 – Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)
The adoption of the amendment to IAS 1 – Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) resulted in additional disclosures on the statement of comprehensive income.
The following standards, interpretations and amendments are effective for the first time for the year ended 31 May 2014 and have not had an impact on the Group’s and Company’s financial statements:
| • |
Amendment to IFRS 1 – First-time Adoption on Government Loans |
| • |
Amendment to IFRS 7 – Financial Instruments: Disclosures – Asset and Liability Offsetting |
| • |
Amendment to IAS 19 – Employee Benefits |
| • |
Amendment to IAS 27 (revised 2011) – Separate Financial Statements |
| • |
Amendment to IAS 28 (revised 2011) – Associates and Joint Ventures |
| • |
IFRIC 20 – Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine |
Standards, amendments and interpretations not yet effective
The Group has evaluated the effect of all new standards, amendments and interpretations that have been issued but which are not yet effective. Based on the evaluation, management does not expect these standards, amendments and interpretations to have a significant impact on the Group’s results and disclosures. The expected implications of applicable standards, amendments and interpretations are dealt with below.
Amendment to IAS 39 on novation of derivatives
The IASB has amended IAS 39 to provide relief from discontinuing hedge accounting when novation of a hedging instrument to a central counterparty meets specified criteria. Similar relief will be included in IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The Group is currently considering the impact on the classification of financial assets, however, do not believe the statement will have a significant impact, given the nature of the financial assets held by the Group.
Amendment to IAS 36 – Impairment of Assets
These amendments address the disclosure of information about the recoverable amount of impaired assets if that amount is based on fair value less cost of disposal.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The Group is currently considering the impact on the consolidated financial statements, however does not believe the statement will have a significant impact.
IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments (2009)
This IFRS is part of the IASB’s project to replace IAS 39. IFRS 9 addresses classification and measurement of financial assets and replaces the multiple classification and measurement models in IAS 39 with a single model that has only two classification categories: amortised cost and fair value.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The Group is currently considering the impact on the classification of financial assets, however do not believe the statement will have a significant impact, given the nature of the financial assets held by the Group.
IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments (2010)
The IASB has updated IFRS 9 – Financial instruments to include guidance on financial liabilities and derecognition of financial instruments. The accounting and presentation for financial liabilities and for derecognising financial instruments has been relocated from IAS 39 – Financial instruments: Recognition and measurement, without change, except for financial liabilities that are designated at fair value through profit or loss.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The Group is currently considering the impact on the derecognition of financial liabilities, however do not believe the statement will have a significant impact, given the nature of the financial liabilities held by the Group.
Amendments to IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments (2011)
The IASB has published an amendment to IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments that delays the effective date to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The original effective date was for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. This amendment is a result of the Board extending its timeline for completing the remaining phases of its project to replace IAS 39 (for example, impairment and hedge accounting) beyond June 2011, as well as the delay in the insurance project. The amendment confirms the importance of allowing entities to apply the requirements of all the phases of the project to replace IAS 39 at the same time. The requirement to restate comparatives and the disclosures required on transition have also been modified.
This amendment has delayed the implementation of the standard from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2018. The impact on the Group is stated above.
IFRS 14 – Regulatory deferral accounts
The IASB has issued IFRS 14 – Regulatory Deferral Accounts (IFRS 14), an interim standard on the accounting for certain balances that arise from rate-regulated activities (regulatory deferral accounts). Rate regulation is a framework where the price that an entity charges to its customers for goods and services is subject to oversight and/or approval by an authorised body.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016 and is not applicable to the Group.
Amendment to IAS 19 regarding defined benefit plan
These narrow scope amendments apply to contributions from employees or third parties to defined benefit plans. The objective of the amendments is to simplify the accounting for contributions that are independent of the number of years of employee service, for example, employee contributions that are calculated according to a fixed percentage of salary.
This amendment is not applicable to the Group.
Amendments to IAS 32 – Financial Instruments: Presentation
The IASB has issued amendments to the application guidance in IAS 32 – Financial Instruments: Presentation that clarify some of the requirements for offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities on the statement of financial position. However, the clarified offsetting requirements for amounts presented in the statement of financial position continue to be different from US GAAP.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The Group is currently considering the impact on the consolidated financial statements, however does not believe the statement will have a significant impact.
Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27 for investment entities
The amendments mean that many funds and similar entities will be exempt from consolidating most of their subsidiaries. Instead they will measure them at fair value through profit or loss. The amendments give an exception to entities that meet an “investment entity” definition and which display particular characteristics. Changes have also been made in IFRS 12 to introduce disclosures that an investment entity needs to make.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The Group is currently considering the impact on the consolidated financial statements, however does not believe the statement will have a significant impact.
IFRS 15 – Revenue From Contracts With Customers
This statement establishes principles for reporting useful information to users of the financial statements about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017. The Group is currently considering the impact on the consolidated financial statements.
IFRIC 21 – Accounting For Levies
IFRIC 21 sets out the accounting for an obligation to pay a levy that is not income tax.
The interpretation addresses diversity in practice around when the liability to pay a levy is recognised.
This statement is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The Group is currently considering the impact on the consolidated financial statements, however does not believe the statement will have a significant impact.
Annual improvements project
The IASB decided to initiate an annual improvements project in 2007 as a method of making necessary, but non-urgent, amendments to IFRS that will not be included as part of another major project. The IASB’s objective was to ease the burden for all concerned.
Improvements to IFRS was issued by the IASB as part of the “annual improvements process” resulting in the following amendments to standards issued, but not effective for 31 May 2014 year-ends:
Amendment to IFRS 2 – Share-Based Payment
The amendment clarifies the definition of a “vesting condition” and separately defines “performance condition” and “service condition”.
Amendment to IFRS 3 – Business Combinations
The standard is amended to clarify that an obligation to pay contingent consideration which meets the definition of a financial instrument is classified as a financial liability or as equity, on the basis of the definitions in IAS 32 – Financial instruments: Presentation.
The standard is further amended to clarify that all non-equity contingent consideration, both financial and non-financial, is measured at fair value at each reporting date, with changes in fair value recognised in profit and loss. Consequential changes are also made to IFRS 9, IAS 37 and IAS 39.
Amendment to IFRS 8 – Operating Segments
The standard is amended to require disclosure of the judgements made by management in aggregating operating segments. This includes a description of the segments which have been aggregated and the economic indicators which have been assessed in determining that the aggregated segments share similar economic characteristics.
The standard is further amended to require a reconciliation of segment assets to the entity’s assets when segment assets are reported.
Amendment to IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement
The IASB has amended the basis for conclusions of IFRS 13 to clarify that it did not intend to remove the ability to measure short-term receivables and payables at invoice amounts.
Amendment to IAS 16 – Property, Plant and Equipment and IAS 38 – Intangible Assets
Both standards are amended to clarify how the gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation are treated where an entity uses the revaluation model.
The carrying amount of the asset is restated to the revalued amount.
The split between gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation is treated in one of the following ways:
| • |
either the gross carrying amount is restated in a manner consistent with the revaluation of the carrying amount, and the accumulated depreciation is adjusted to equal the difference between the gross carrying amount and the carrying amount after taking into account accumulated impairment losses; or |
| • |
the accumulated depreciation is eliminated against the gross carrying amount. |
Amendment to IAS 24 – Related Party Disclosures
The standard is amended to include, as a related party, an entity that provides key management personnel services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the reporting entity (the management entity).
Management is currently considering the effect of the changes.
Basis of consolidation
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.
The Group applies the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred to the former owners of the acquiree and the equity interests issued by the Group. The consideration transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The Group recognises any non-controlling interest in the acquiree on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis, either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the recognised amounts of acquiree’s identifiable net assets.
Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date carrying value of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date; any gains or losses arising from such remeasurement are recognised in profit or loss.
Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the Group is recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration that is deemed to be an asset or liability is recognised in accordance with IAS 39 either in profit or loss or as a change to other comprehensive income. Contingent consideration that is classified as equity is not remeasured, and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.
The excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the acquisition-date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the total of consideration transferred, non-controlling interest recognised and previously held interest measured is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired in the case of a bargain purchase, the difference is recognised directly in the statement of comprehensive income.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated. When necessary, amounts, reported by subsidiaries have been adjusted to conform with the Group’s accounting policies.
Transactions with non-controlling interests that do not result in loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions, i.e. as transactions with the owners in their capacity as owners. The difference between fair value of any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recorded in equity. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recorded in equity.
When the Group ceases to have control, any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair value at the date when control is lost, with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest as an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the Group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss.
Associates
Associates are all entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recognised at cost, and the carrying amount is increased or decreased to recognise the investor’s share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition. The Group’s investment in associates includes goodwill identified on acquisition.
If the ownership interest in an associate is reduced but significant influence is retained, only a proportionate share of the amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified to profit or loss where appropriate.
The Group’s share of post-acquisition profit or loss is recognised in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in other comprehensive income is recognised in other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the investment. When the Group’s share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other unsecured receivables, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.
The Group determines at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that the investment in the associate is impaired. If this is the case, the Group calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount of the associate and its carrying value and recognises the amount adjacent to share of profit/(loss) from associates in the statement of comprehensive income.
Profits and losses resulting from upstream and downstream transactions between the Group and its associate are recognised in the Group’s financial statements only to the extent of unrelated investor’s interests in the associates. Unrealised losses are eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Dilution gains and losses arising in investments in associates are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.
Joint ventures
Under IFRS 11, investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and obligations of each investor. The Group has assessed the nature of its joint arrangements and determined them to be joint ventures. Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method.
Under the equity method of accounting, interests in joint ventures are initially recognised at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognise the Group’s share of the post-acquisition profits or losses and movements in other comprehensive income. When the Group’s share of losses in a joint venture equals or exceeds its interests in the joint venture (which includes any long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the Group’s net investment in the joint venture), the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the joint venture.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the joint ventures. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of the joint ventures have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
The Company financial statements account for investments in joint ventures at cost less any accumulated impairment. |